- You have items in your cart!
Examining authority is a special approval granted by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to certain Part 141 flight schools, allowing them to conduct in-house practical tests (checkrides) and directly issue pilot certificates upon a student’s course completion . In a typical flight training scenario, even Part 141 schools without examining authority must have their graduates take the final checkride with an FAA inspector or Designated Pilot Examiner (DPE) to earn the license. By contrast, a school with examining authority can have its Chief or Assistant Chief Flight Instructor perform the final evaluation and award the certificate internally . This ability essentially makes the school’s end-of-course exam the official FAA checkride.
Regulatory framework: Examining authority is outlined under 14 CFR Part 141, Subpart D. To qualify, a pilot school must meet stringent prerequisites established by the FAA . Key requirements include:
In essence, examining authority is an elite status – as of recent surveys, only about 6.5% of FAA-approved Part 141 pilot schools hold examining authority for at least one course . This exclusive group of schools has proven their training programs produce high student success rates and adhere to FAA standards. The FAA’s rationale is that these trusted schools can self-examine their students without compromising the rigor of the certification process. The result is a win-win: the FAA alleviates strain on its DPE resources, and the schools’ students benefit from a streamlined path to certification.
Flight training can be accomplished under Part 61 (flexible, instructor-driven training) or Part 141 (structured school programs). Part 141 schools with examining authority offer a unique subset of advantages over both Part 61 training and Part 141 schools lacking that authority. Below is a comparison across key factors:
Success rates: Schools with examining authority are, by definition, maintaining very high student pass rates. They must sustain ≥90% first-time pass rates on FAA exams to keep that status . This often translates to rigorous training standards and well-prepared students. By comparison, industry-wide averages for first-attempt pass rates are lower – for example, in 2021 the nationwide pass rate was about 78% for private pilot checkrides and 79.5% for commercial pilot checkrides . Initial Certified Flight Instructor (CFI) pass rates have historically been even lower (around 70–78% range) . Part 141 schools without examining authority are not inherently low-performing, but they are not required to meet the 90% benchmark. Thus, an examining authority school’s high pass rate signals a strong curriculum and effective student preparation. Students at these schools can be confident that the program’s quality has been vetted through consistent exam success.
Completion times: A major practical difference is the speed at which students can complete training and earn their certificates. At schools without examining authority, a student must schedule an external FAA or DPE checkride after finishing the school’s curriculum. Due to a national shortage of examiners, this often introduces significant wait times. Surveys of flight training providers indicate that in many regions, students wait 3 or more weeks (sometimes over a month) for an available checkride slot . In fact, 84% of flight schools polled considered DPE availability to be a moderate or serious problem for their students . These delays can extend the overall training timeline. A student who finishes flight training may spend idle weeks before obtaining the license, potentially losing proficiency or momentum.
In contrast, at a school with examining authority, the end-of-course flight test is the final checkride. There is no external scheduling delay – the checkride can usually be conducted as soon as the student is ready, by an in-house examiner. For example, Thrust Flight in Texas notes that its examining authority has eliminated the typical 2–4 week wait for DPE scheduling, allowing students to “complete training significantly faster” . Another academy with examining authority, CTI Professional Flight Training, advertises an accelerated timeline from zero experience to Commercial Pilot in just 6–8 months due to its structured Part 141 program and in-house exams . Students in such programs don’t pause training to find an examiner; they seamlessly transition into the checkride and on to the next course. Overall, examining authority schools tend to produce graduates on a faster timeline, since the bottleneck of scheduling external checkrides is removed. This efficiency can save several weeks per rating – a significant reduction when accumulating multiple certificates (Private, Instrument, Commercial, CFI) back-to-back.
Training costs: The tuition or hourly rates at an examining authority flight school versus another Part 141 school are often comparable, but where significant cost savings emerge is in checkride fees and delay-related expenses. Normally, when using an outside DPE, students must pay the examiner’s fee for each practical test. These fees vary by region and rating, but commonly fall in the range of $500 to $800 (or more) per checkride in the U.S. . For instance, a private pilot practical test might average around $700, and some examiners charge up to $1,000 for higher-level or complex checkrides . If a student needs four checkrides (PPL, Instrument, Commercial, CFI), the out-of-pocket examiner fees alone could total several thousand dollars. Furthermore, any retest after a failed attempt incurs another fee.
Flight schools with examining authority eliminate or greatly reduce these examiner fees. The in-house checkrides are conducted by salaried school staff (Chief/Assistant Chief Instructors), so students typically don’t pay an extra third-party fee. Some schools might charge a nominal administrative fee for an end-of-course exam, but it is often much less than an external DPE’s rate. In Thrust Flight’s case, the school explicitly highlights that examining authority “saves [students] time and money” in their program . Beyond the direct fee savings, avoiding long wait times can avert indirect costs: when students have to wait weeks for a checkride, they often need additional practice flights or simulator sessions to stay sharp, which adds expense. By completing checkrides immediately, students at examining authority schools can finish without those extra “continuation” flights.
Overall training efficiency also means less time renting aircraft or paying for living expenses while in training. A compressed training schedule (enabled by ready availability of checkrides) can reduce the total months a student spends training full-time, which in turn can lower housing and subsistence costs for out-of-town students. In summary, while the base training cost per hour might be similar, examining authority streamlines the process to make the total cost of earning a certificate lower. Every delay avoided is money saved, and every first-time pass averts the cost of retraining and retesting.
From a student’s perspective, examining authority greatly enhances convenience and keeps training momentum high. Scheduling convenience is a prime benefit – students don’t need to coordinate with an outside examiner’s schedule or travel to a different airport for a test. Instead, they can often take the practical test at their home airport, with a familiar instructor, on a date immediately following their course completion. The hassle of dealing with DPE backlogs is taken off the student’s shoulders entirely . Given that 83% of flight schools report an undersupply of DPEs in their area , the ability to bypass this hurdle is a relief for students. They can finish a stage of training on (for example) a Friday and take the checkride on Monday, rather than finishing and then waiting weeks while skills potentially atrophy.
Training continuity is therefore much better at an examining authority school. Continuous training means the student stays engaged and focused without interruption. This can improve learning retention and skill proficiency going into the checkride, increasing the likelihood of passing on the first attempt. By contrast, even a few weeks of downtime before a checkride can introduce rust or require repeat lessons. Students often report needing a refresher flight or two if a long gap occurs between their last lesson and the checkride. Examining authority essentially removes that gap. One flight academy described this as a “streamlined path” through multiple ratings – for example, a student can complete a Private Pilot course and immediately roll into the Instrument course without scheduling logistics slowing them down . This efficient sequence benefits motivated career-track students aiming to accumulate certifications quickly.
Another convenience factor is stress reduction. Many student pilots feel anxious about being evaluated by an unknown examiner. At an examining authority school, the evaluator is likely someone the student knows – the Chief or another senior instructor from the same school. Completing the checkride in a familiar environment (your usual airport, in a school aircraft you’ve been training in) with an instructor who has seen your progress can put students more at ease . The testing standards are identical, but the psychological comfort can be higher. Some pilots consider this “the less stressful option since you’re already familiar with your school’s instructors, and they’re familiar with you” . Reduced stress can translate to better performance during the exam, again feeding into the success rates.
On the other hand, a non-examining authority path can offer an unintended convenience: the school’s end-of-course stage check (an internal mock checkride) effectively becomes a practice run before the actual FAA exam. In most Part 141 programs without examining authority, you must pass the school’s internal evaluation to be signed off for the real checkride . Some might argue this two-step process gives students extra preparation. However, any reputable school (with or without examining authority) will ensure the student is thoroughly prepared by the time they face their final test, so a second redundant checkride is not usually necessary when training quality is high. Overall, students generally prefer to “train once, test once” rather than endure two checkrides per rating, especially if the second one is subject to scheduling delays.
Earning certifications through a flight school with examining authority does not diminish the credibility of those certifications – they are the same FAA licenses issued to any pilot. In fact, there are arguments that such schools can enhance a pilot’s credibility due to the high standards required to obtain and maintain examining authority. The FAA holds these schools to “incredibly high standards,” with continuous audits to ensure exceptional training quality and performance outcomes . The very fact that a school was granted examining authority signals that it has a proven track record of training competent pilots (demonstrated by that ≥90% pass rate with outside examiners). In other words, a graduate of an examining authority program comes from an institution that the FAA itself has effectively endorsed for its quality. This can carry weight with prospective employers or in advanced training applications.
Many aviation employers (regional airlines, corporate flight departments, etc.) value consistency and a strong foundation in a pilot’s training. Completing a rigorous Part 141 curriculum under examining authority means the pilot was trained and evaluated under a consistently applied standard. These schools often have very structured syllabi, standard operating procedures, and formal stage checks that mirror airline training culture. Some major airlines partner with top flight academies and university aviation programs (many of which hold examining authority or comparable authorizations) to recruit pilots. For example, certain regional airlines have cadet programs with Part 141 schools, and United Airlines’ Aviate program lists participating flight schools as preferred recruitment sources. This indicates a level of trust in the quality of those schools’ training. While all FAA-certified pilots ultimately meet the same practical test standards, those from an examining-authority school have been continuously assessed to those standards internally, which can reduce variability.
One consideration is how checkride results are viewed in a pilot’s record. Airlines do review an applicant’s history of checkride passes or failures during hiring. In a traditional path, a pilot might have, say, four FAA checkrides (private, instrument, commercial, CFI). At an examining authority school, some of those checkrides are done in-house – but they still count as official attempts. Employers generally see no difference between an internal checkride (under examining authority) and one with a DPE; both result in issuance of a pilot certificate and both would count as a pass/fail in the record. The upside is that examining authority schools strive for high first-time pass rates, so their students are less likely to have a string of failures. However, it also means there’s no “behind closed doors” second chance – if a student were to fail an in-house checkride, it is effectively a failed checkride on record. The best examining authority programs manage this by ensuring students are thoroughly ready before attempting the end-of-course exam, often via internal practice checks. The net effect is that graduates emerge with strong records. A clean record of first-attempt passes on all pilot exams is a gold star on a new pilot’s resume. It demonstrates both the individual’s aptitude and the quality of training – factors that can improve hiring prospects in a competitive job market.
In terms of employability, the faster timeline at an examining authority school can also be beneficial. Pilots reach its milestones sooner and can start accruing experience (like flight instructing hours or turbine time) earlier than their peers. In a fast-moving industry hiring cycle, being able to apply for airline or charter jobs a few months earlier might mean catching a hiring window or upgrading sooner. Employers ultimately care that you have the required certificate and experience, but graduating from a known high-caliber program with examining authority could give a slight edge in networking and reputation. At the very least, students report confidence that their training was comprehensive and standardized, which helps them perform well in airline training or subsequent checkouts.
Finally, the credibility of examining authority is evident from the FAA’s own data: only a small fraction of flight schools qualify, and those schools conducted about 13% of all pilot practical tests in the U.S. in a recent year (meaning thousands of airmen are certificated via this method). These are fully legitimate airmen certifications. Alumni of such schools are flying for airlines and military, instructing, and working throughout the industry – a testament that an in-house issued certificate holds the same privileges and respect as any other FAA license.
Examining authority can have a measurable positive impact on student outcomes. Here we analyze specific areas:
The strong training pedigree of examining authority schools also contributes to hiring prospects. Airlines often ask about an applicant’s training background and might recognize certain schools known for quality. Many graduates of examining authority programs go on to successful airline careers; some schools even have direct flow programs to regional airlines (for example, partnerships with airlines’ cadet programs, as seen with Thrust Flight partnering with American Airlines’ Envoy program ). While possessing a license from an examining authority school does not guarantee a job, it aligns the pilot with a high-quality training ethos that airlines appreciate. Just as importantly, the focus on professional standards (punctual training schedules, formal evaluations, documentation) at these schools can groom students in soft skills valuable to employers. By having fewer hiccups in training (fewer retests or delays), graduates tend to have cleaner records and more confidence, which can make for stronger interviewees.
It’s worth noting that airlines do not officially “prefer” graduates of examining authority schools over others – they hire based on flight hours, qualifications, and overall candidate merit. However, indirectly, a graduate of such a school may simply have more to offer sooner. For example, high first-try pass rates mean a graduate likely has zero checkride failures to explain in an interview – something pilot recruiters certainly notice. Additionally, the intensive training environment of a 141 examining authority school often involves scenario-based training and crew resource management elements that are good prep for airline operations. Many university aviation programs (some of which hold examining authority) report that their alumni have an easier transition to airline training. All these factors combine to give students from examining authority schools a potential edge in launching their careers.
To illustrate the effects of examining authority, consider the following real-world examples of flight schools with and without this privilege:
These examples reinforce that examining authority can make a tangible difference. Schools like Thrust Flight and CTI have data showing reduced wait times and high pass rates, while even big institutions like ERAU utilize it to a degree to keep their pipeline moving. Conversely, schools without it provide a cautionary tale of the typical hurdles (which many students do overcome, but with more effort). Across the board, the trends point to examining authority yielding faster completions, higher first-time success, and more efficient training.
In conclusion, flight schools that hold examining authority offer clear advantages that can significantly benefit an aspiring pilot’s training journey. These schools have proven themselves by maintaining exceptional training standards and are rewarded by the FAA with the ability to conduct their own checkrides. For students, this means:
Given these benefits, flight schools with examining authority stand out as premier choices for aspiring pilots who are serious about their training and career. They combine the structure and oversight of Part 141 with an efficiency that rivals any other training method. By choosing a school with this privilege, a student is essentially opting into a program that has been vetted for excellence and is empowered to carry them through each certification without external roadblocks. The result is a faster, smoother, and more successful path to becoming a licensed pilot. In a time when the aviation industry is hungry for well-trained new pilots, aligning yourself with a top-tier flight school that has examining authority can be one of the smartest moves to kick-start your flying career.